Chapter Member Photo: Angela Jones

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   Next >  Last >> 
  • February 07, 2025 6:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Fraud can happen in any organization, large or small, public or private. According to the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners’ (ACFE) Report to the Nations, organizations lose an average of 5% of annual revenue to fraud. Strengthening internal controls is one of the most effective ways to mitigate this risk, ensuring your organization is protected from fraud and operational inefficiencies.

    Here are key strategies to strengthen internal controls in your organization:

    1. Segregation of Duties

    One of the simplest yet most effective internal control mechanisms is the segregation of duties (SoD). No single employee should have control over all aspects of a financial transaction, such as authorization, recording, and custody of assets.

    Why it matters: SoD prevents one individual from committing and concealing fraud.

    Example: Ensure that the person approving invoices is not the same person processing payments.

    2. Regular and Surprise Audits

    Audits are essential to assess whether policies and procedures are being followed, but the element of surprise adds an extra layer of deterrence.

    Why it matters: Employees are less likely to commit fraud if they know their work could be reviewed unexpectedly.

    How to implement: Schedule periodic audits while incorporating surprise checks into the routine.

    3. Clear Policies and Procedures

    Establish clear, documented policies for critical processes such as procurement, expense reimbursement, and cash handling.

    Why it matters: Policies provide a framework for employees to understand what is acceptable and expected.

    Tip: Regularly review and update these policies to reflect changes in your organization or industry.

    4. Leverage Technology

    Modern technology can play a pivotal role in fraud prevention. Implement tools like data analytics software and automated controls to monitor transactions and flag anomalies.

    Why it matters: Technology can identify unusual patterns or behaviors that might indicate fraud.

    Example: Use automated systems to require multiple approvals for high-value transactions.

    5. Strong Whistleblower Programs

    Encourage employees to report suspicious activities without fear of retaliation. A strong whistleblower program can uncover fraud early, before it escalates.

    Why it matters: The ACFE reports that 42% of fraud cases are detected by tips, making whistleblower programs the most effective detection tool.

    How to implement: Set up anonymous reporting channels and train employees on how to use them.

    6. Ongoing Employee Training

    Regular training on fraud awareness ensures all employees are vigilant and informed about the latest fraud schemes.

    Why it matters: Educated employees are more likely to recognize and report red flags.

    Tip: Include fraud prevention training as part of your onboarding process and conduct refresher sessions annually.

    7. Perform Fraud Risk Assessments

    Conducting regular fraud risk assessments helps identify and address vulnerabilities in your internal controls.

    Why it matters: Proactively identifying risks can prevent fraud from occurring.

    How to implement: Engage Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) to evaluate your organization’s processes and recommend improvements.

    8. Monitor and Review Controls

    Strong internal controls require continuous monitoring to remain effective. Establish a system for regularly reviewing and testing these controls.

    Why it matters: Fraud schemes evolve, and your controls should adapt to meet emerging risks.

    Example: Review access permissions periodically to ensure they align with employees’ current responsibilities.

    Final Thoughts

    Internal controls are your organization’s first line of defense against fraud. By implementing robust controls and fostering a culture of transparency and accountability, you can significantly reduce fraud risk. Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) are well-equipped to help organizations design, implement, and monitor these controls effectively.

    If you’d like to learn more about strengthening internal controls or need guidance on assessing your organization’s fraud risks, connect with the ACFE Pacific Northwest Chapter. Let’s work together to build stronger, fraud-resistant organizations!

    Stay informed on fraud prevention strategies and trends by visiting our blog regularly. Follow us on LinkedIn for updates and resources.

    #FraudPrevention #InternalControls #ACFEPNW #FraudAwarenessWeek



  • January 31, 2025 6:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The U.S. Department of Justice’s Fraud Section has released its 2024 Year in Review, highlighting its major fraud enforcement actions and evolving strategies to combat financial crime. This past year marked record-breaking corporate settlements, aggressive enforcement against high-level offenders, and enhanced investigative techniques, all of which have significant implications for fraud examiners and compliance professionals.

    A Year of High-Impact Prosecutions

    In 2024, the Fraud Section:

    ✔️ Charged 234 individuals for financial crimes, including corporate executives and professionals.

    ✔️ Secured convictions against 252 individuals, reflecting a high success rate in prosecutions.

    ✔️ Resolved cases with over $2.3 billion in corporate settlements, tripling the amount from 2023.

    Notably, 35% of those charged were high-ranking executives, attorneys, accountants, and other gatekeepers, signaling a shift toward targeting those enabling fraud schemes rather than just individual perpetrators.

    The Most Prolific Fraud Schemes in 2024

    The DOJ’s Fraud Section targeted a wide range of financial crimes, but three key fraud schemes dominated enforcement actions in 2024:

    1️⃣ Healthcare Fraud & COVID-19 Relief Fraud

    The Healthcare Fraud Unit aggressively pursued individuals and entities exploiting federal programs:

    $1.2 billion in fraudulent claims uncovered, including Medicare/Medicaid fraud, kickback schemes, and unnecessary medical services.

    •Convictions of doctors, medical professionals, and corporate executives involved in overbilling, false diagnoses, and illegal referrals.

    COVID-19 relief fraud remained a focus, with fraudsters exploiting PPP loans, unemployment assistance, and healthcare relief funds.

    2️⃣ Corporate & Securities Fraud

    Financial crimes affecting investors and markets resulted in high-profile corporate settlements and prosecutions:

    Market manipulation and insider trading schemes targeted major financial institutions and hedge funds.

    •Convictions for executives engaging in fraudulent financial reporting, Ponzi schemes, and investment fraud.

    •Increased use of data analytics to detect suspicious trading patterns, pump-and-dump schemes, and accounting fraud.

    3️⃣ Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) & Bribery

    The DOJ’s anti-bribery enforcement surged, targeting international corporate misconduct:

    •Resolutions with major multinational corporations spanning China, Germany, Brazil, Spain, Australia, Switzerland, and South Africa.

    •The largest-ever corporate settlement for FCPA violations involving a major energy company.

    •Introduction of the International Corporate Anti-Bribery (ICAB) Initiative to increase cross-border enforcement.

    Cutting-Edge Enforcement Strategies

    The Fraud Section introduced several key initiatives in 2024 to improve fraud detection and prosecution:

    Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program – Encourages individuals to report misconduct, similar to SEC whistleblower incentives.

    AI & Data Analytics in Fraud Investigations – DOJ analysts used AI-driven detection tools to uncover fraud patterns in market trading, healthcare billing, and financial transactions.

    Enhanced Corporate Voluntary Disclosure Policy – Encouraging self-reporting and cooperation to mitigate corporate penalties.

    Key Takeaways for Fraud Examiners

    Increased Scrutiny of High-Level Executives – Expect more prosecutions of corporate gatekeepers such as accountants, attorneys, and compliance officers.

    Data-Driven Investigations – The DOJ’s use of AI and analytics reinforces the importance of forensic accounting and fraud detection technology.

    Global Expansion of Fraud Enforcement – The DOJ’s international cases highlight the growing need for compliance programs that address cross-border fraud risks.

    As the DOJ Fraud Section enters its 70th year, its enforcement actions continue to shape the landscape of corporate compliance, financial fraud investigations, and anti-corruption efforts. Fraud examiners, compliance officers, and investigators should take note of emerging fraud trends and enforcement priorities to enhance their fraud prevention strategies.

    For a full overview of the DOJ Fraud Section’s 2024 Year in Review, visit the Department of Justice website here.

    Stay informed on the latest fraud trends and enforcement updates by following the ACFE Pacific Northwest Chapter.



  • January 26, 2025 5:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The FBI has issued a public service announcement highlighting the increasing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) by criminals to enhance the effectiveness and scale of financial fraud schemes. Generative AI enables the creation of highly convincing synthetic content, making it more challenging for individuals and organizations to detect fraudulent activities.

    AI-Generated Text

    Criminals leverage AI to produce realistic text, facilitating various fraudulent activities:

    Social Engineering and Phishing: Crafting persuasive messages to deceive individuals into revealing sensitive information or transferring funds.

    Fake Profiles: Generating numerous fictitious social media profiles to lure victims into financial scams.

    Enhanced Language Proficiency: Utilizing AI for language translation to minimize errors, thereby increasing the credibility of scams targeting individuals across different regions.

    AI-Generated Images

    The use of AI extends to creating realistic images that support fraudulent schemes:

    Deceptive Profiles: Producing authentic-looking photos for fake social media accounts involved in romance and investment scams.

    Fake Identification: Creating counterfeit identification documents to facilitate identity theft and impersonation.

    False Endorsements: Generating images of celebrities or influencers promoting counterfeit products or fraudulent services.

    AI-Generated Audio and Video

    Advancements in AI have made it possible to clone voices and create realistic videos:

    Vocal Cloning: Impersonating voices of relatives or authority figures to request urgent financial assistance or conduct ransom demands.

    Deepfake Videos: Creating videos of public figures to lend credibility to fraudulent schemes or misinformation campaigns.

    Protective Measures

    To safeguard against these sophisticated AI-driven frauds, consider the following steps:

    Verification Protocols: Establish secret codes or phrases with family members to confirm identities during emergencies.

    Scrutinize Content: Be vigilant for subtle inconsistencies in images, videos, or audio that may indicate manipulation, such as unnatural movements or mismatched lip-syncing.

    Limit Personal Exposure: Restrict the amount of personal information, images, and audio shared publicly online to reduce the risk of them being exploited for fraudulent purposes.

    Independent Verification: Always verify unsolicited requests for financial assistance or sensitive information by contacting the individual or organization directly through known and trusted channels.

    As generative AI technology continues to evolve, it is crucial for individuals and organizations to remain vigilant and adopt proactive measures to detect and prevent AI-facilitated fraud. Staying informed about these emerging threats and implementing robust verification processes can significantly reduce the risk of falling victim to such schemes.

    For more detailed information, please refer to the FBI’s official announcement.

  • January 19, 2025 8:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    In today’s digital age, the lines between fraud examination and cybersecurity are increasingly blurred. As organizations embrace digital transformation, fraudsters are exploiting technology to perpetrate complex schemes that challenge traditional investigative approaches. For Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs), understanding the intersection of cybersecurity and fraud examination is crucial for effectively identifying, investigating, and preventing fraud in a digital landscape.

    The Cybersecurity-Fraud Nexus

    Cybersecurity focuses on protecting systems, networks, and data from unauthorized access, breaches, and attacks. Fraud examination, on the other hand, aims to detect, investigate, and prevent deceptive activities that cause financial harm. Despite their distinct objectives, these fields overlap significantly when it comes to detecting and mitigating fraud perpetrated through cyber means.

    Key Areas of Overlap:

    1.Data Breaches: Cybercriminals use stolen data to commit identity theft, financial fraud, and more. CFEs can help trace the misuse of stolen information and quantify its financial impact.

    2.Social Engineering: Techniques like phishing are used to deceive employees into revealing sensitive information. Fraud examiners can identify patterns and educate organizations to reduce susceptibility.

    3.Internal Threats: Disgruntled employees with access to sensitive data can exploit vulnerabilities. CFEs work alongside cybersecurity professionals to monitor, detect, and investigate these threats.

    Why CFEs Should Understand Cybersecurity

    With the rise of cyber-enabled fraud, CFEs must develop a foundational understanding of cybersecurity principles. This knowledge equips them to:

    Recognize cyber-related fraud schemes, such as ransomware attacks or e-commerce fraud.

    Collaborate effectively with cybersecurity teams to gather digital evidence.

    Stay ahead of emerging threats in the ever-evolving digital landscape.

    Essential Cybersecurity Skills for CFEs:

    Understanding digital forensics to collect and analyze electronic evidence.

    Familiarity with encryption, authentication, and access control mechanisms.

    Knowledge of cybersecurity frameworks like NIST or ISO 27001.

    Common Cyber-Enabled Fraud Schemes

    1.Business Email Compromise (BEC):

    Fraudsters impersonate executives or vendors to trick employees into wiring money.

    Prevention Tip: Educate employees to verify unusual requests through secondary channels.

    2.Synthetic Identity Fraud:

    Criminals combine real and fabricated information to create new identities, often to secure loans or credit.

    Prevention Tip: Use advanced analytics and AI to detect anomalies in application data.

    3.Ransomware Attacks:

    Attackers encrypt an organization’s data and demand payment for its release.

    Prevention Tip: Maintain regular backups and implement multi-factor authentication (MFA).

    Collaboration Between CFEs and Cybersecurity Professionals

    Fraud prevention and cybersecurity teams often operate in silos, but collaboration is critical for effective defense. Here’s how these teams can work together:

    Joint Investigations: CFEs can provide expertise in tracing fraudulent transactions, while cybersecurity professionals focus on securing systems and identifying breaches.

    Training and Awareness: Together, these teams can educate employees on recognizing fraud and maintaining cybersecurity best practices.

    Incident Response: When a cyberattack occurs, CFEs and cybersecurity experts can coordinate efforts to mitigate financial and reputational damage.

    Best Practices for Organizations

    1.Implement an Integrated Fraud and Cybersecurity Framework:

    Develop policies that address both fraud prevention and cybersecurity risks.

    Use technology to monitor transactions and detect suspicious activity in real time.

    2.Invest in Training:

    Ensure employees understand the basics of cybersecurity and fraud schemes.

    Provide specialized training for CFEs to enhance their cybersecurity skills.

    3.Leverage Technology:

    Utilize AI and machine learning to analyze data patterns for signs of fraud.

    Employ forensic tools to uncover and preserve digital evidence.

    Looking Ahead

    The intersection of cybersecurity and fraud examination is not just a trend but a necessity in modern fraud prevention. As CFEs, staying informed about cybersecurity developments and fostering collaboration with IT and cybersecurity teams will empower you to stay one step ahead of fraudsters.

    By embracing the synergy between these disciplines, CFEs can play a pivotal role in helping organizations protect their assets, reputations, and stakeholders in the face of evolving cyber threats.

    For more insights on fraud prevention and cybersecurity, visit the ACFE Pacific Northwest Chapter website. Together, let’s bridge the gap between fraud examination and cybersecurity to create safer, fraud-resistant organizations.




  • January 05, 2025 6:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    A recent article published by Forbes highlights an alarming new frontier in identity fraud: hackers on the dark web have built “Face ID farms,” amassing databases of AI-generated facial identities and real-world biometric data. These tools are used to bypass identity verification processes, such as Face ID, creating a new challenge for fraud examiners and organizations worldwide. As technology advances, so too does the sophistication of fraud schemes, making it essential for Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) to stay informed and vigilant.

    What Is a Face ID Farm?

    Face ID farms are hubs where hackers leverage AI and deepfake technology to create or manipulate facial images capable of bypassing biometric verification systems. These databases contain both synthetic and stolen biometric data, making it increasingly difficult to differentiate between legitimate and fraudulent users. By combining AI-generated faces with stolen personal information, criminals can create convincing digital identities, enabling them to commit crimes such as:

    •Account takeovers

    •Synthetic identity fraud

    •Financial fraud and unauthorized transactions

    •Government benefits fraud

    Why This Matters to CFEs and Organizations

    Biometric authentication systems, such as facial recognition, are often viewed as secure safeguards against fraud. However, the emergence of AI-generated identities demonstrates that these systems are not foolproof. Fraudsters can exploit vulnerabilities in biometric verification to pass as legitimate users, undermining the integrity of security protocols.

    CFEs and anti-fraud professionals must understand how AI-powered fraud schemes operate in order to detect and prevent them effectively. Without proper safeguards, organizations may become unwitting victims of identity-related fraud, risking financial losses, reputational damage, and compromised customer trust.

    Red Flags: How CFEs Can Detect Fraudulent Use of AI

    Detecting fraudulent use of AI requires a multi-faceted approach. Here are some key indicators that CFEs can monitor:

    1.Behavioral Inconsistencies

    – Fraudulent users may pass biometric verification but exhibit unusual behavior patterns, such as accessing accounts from multiple IP addresses or using outdated device signatures.

    – Transaction anomalies, such as conducting large transfers during off-hours or repeatedly updating personal details, may indicate compromised accounts.

    2.Pixel and Image Analysis

    – Conduct forensic analysis of profile pictures and facial images. AI-generated images often have subtle flaws, such as inconsistent lighting, mismatched earrings, or blurred backgrounds. Tools that detect deepfakes can help identify synthetic images.

    3.Verification Failures in Real-Time Interactions

    – Require live verification processes, such as blinking, speaking, or turning the head. Synthetic faces and images often fail when subjected to real-time, dynamic prompts.

    4.Rapid Account Creations and Fraud Clusters

    – Fraudulent actors often create multiple accounts at once. Monitor for clusters of new account creations linked by shared data points, such as device fingerprints or geolocation patterns.

    5.Unusual Changes in Biometric Verification Attempts

    – Investigate multiple failed attempts followed by sudden success in biometric verification. This may indicate fraudsters testing AI-generated images until they pass.

    Best Practices for Organizations to Strengthen Fraud Prevention

    To counter AI-driven identity fraud, organizations should implement robust fraud detection frameworks that include:

    1.Layered Authentication

    – Avoid relying solely on facial recognition or biometrics. Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA), such as time-based one-time passwords (TOTP) or physical security keys, to add an additional layer of defense.

    2.AI-Powered Fraud Detection Solutions

    – Deploy advanced fraud detection systems capable of identifying deepfakes and synthetic identities through machine learning and behavioral analytics.

    3.Collaboration with Cybersecurity Teams

    – Fraud investigators should work closely with IT and cybersecurity teams to ensure that fraud detection tools are regularly updated and capable of identifying the latest threats.

    4.Employee Training and Awareness

    – Train employees on emerging fraud trends, including AI-generated identities, so they can recognize red flags and escalate concerns promptly.

    5.Digital Identity Verification Vendors

    – Partner with reputable digital identity verification vendors that use advanced liveness detection technologies to verify the authenticity of biometric data.

    The Role of CFEs in Combating AI Fraud

    Certified Fraud Examiners play a critical role in mitigating the impact of AI-driven fraud. By incorporating forensic analysis techniques and collaborating with cross-functional teams, CFEs can help identify synthetic identities, expose fraudulent schemes, and strengthen organizational defenses. Staying informed on the latest fraud schemes—such as those highlighted in the Forbes article—is crucial for maintaining an edge against cybercriminals.

    As the use of AI in fraud schemes continues to grow, so must the strategies used to combat them. By adopting proactive fraud detection measures and implementing AI-resistant safeguards, organizations can protect themselves and their stakeholders from this evolving threat.

    Conclusion

    The rise of Face ID farms and AI-generated identities is a stark reminder that fraudsters are constantly adapting. However, CFEs equipped with the right tools and knowledge can detect these schemes and protect organizations from their impact. It is vital for anti-fraud professionals to stay ahead of technological advancements and foster a culture of collaboration and vigilance within their organizations.

    As a community of fraud professionals, the ACFE PNW Chapter encourages continued education and awareness to strengthen our collective efforts in the fight against fraud.

    For more information on this topic and other fraud trends, visit our blog for regular updates. Together, we can outpace even the most sophisticated fraudsters.




  • December 29, 2024 8:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    As we approach the end of 2024, fraud examiners across the Pacific Northwest—and around the globe—have witnessed an unprecedented range of schemes targeting businesses, governments, and individuals alike. From sophisticated deepfake attacks to large-scale cryptocurrency heists, this year has shown that fraudsters continue to adapt and evolve, using emerging technologies and global events to their advantage. Below, we highlight some of the most prevalent fraud schemes of 2024, along with insights for preventing and detecting these threats in the future.

    1. AI-Driven Social Engineering

    What Happened:

    The rapid advancement of generative AI tools in 2024 has made social engineering attacks more convincing and harder to detect. Fraudsters are using deepfake audio and video to impersonate executives or loved ones, tricking victims into disclosing sensitive information or authorizing fraudulent payments.

    Key Tactics:

    Voice Phishing (Vishing): High-fidelity fake “CEO” calls to employees demanding urgent payments

    Synthetic Videos: Pretend Zoom calls with cloned C-suite executives “confirming” high-dollar wire transfers

    AI Chatbot Scams: Fraudsters employing AI-driven chat interfaces to build trust and solicit personal data

    Prevention Tips:

    •Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) and strict internal controls for wire transfers

    •Educate teams on red flags of urgent payment requests—especially if they come from unfamiliar channels

    •Keep abreast of new AI detection tools and partner with IT teams to test them

    2. Business Email Compromise (BEC) 2.0

    What Happened:

    While Business Email Compromise is not new, 2024 saw a more refined approach. Attackers spoof vendor emails with uncanny accuracy, factoring in details like typical invoice amounts, payment terms, and branding elements. This “BEC 2.0” tactic often bypasses older email security filters.

    Key Tactics:

    Vendor Impersonation: Fraudsters send convincing invoices closely mirroring legitimate vendor details

    Account Takeovers: Compromised corporate email accounts used to place false purchase orders

    Phishing for Credentials: Employees tricked into disclosing login details via malicious links

    Prevention Tips:

    •Conduct routine vendor verification, especially for changes in banking details

    •Establish a dual-approval process for large payments or new vendor setups

    •Deploy real-time monitoring for suspicious logins or IP addresses

    3. Cryptocurrency and NFT Scams

    What Happened:

    The crypto sphere remained a playground for scammers in 2024. Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) continued to pique consumer interest, but unscrupulous players launched “rug pull” schemes—attracting investors and then disappearing with funds. Meanwhile, crypto romance scams on social platforms soared, where con artists lured victims into fraudulent investments.

    Key Tactics:

    Fake ICOs and Airdrops: Promises of free coins to drive traffic to malicious sites

    Discord Community Exploits: Hackers hijacking official NFT or crypto project channels to distribute malicious links

    Pump-and-Dump Schemes: Artificially inflating token values before selling en masse

    Prevention Tips:

    •Verify the legitimacy of any new crypto project or NFT collection before investing

    •Look for established smart contract audits and transparent development teams

    •Educate clients and employees on the warning signs of unrealistic investment returns

    4. Pandemic Relief Fraud (Ongoing)

    What Happened:

    Despite a gradual phase-out of many COVID-19–era relief programs, criminals have still found ways to exploit government stimulus packages and small business loans well into 2024. Falsified applications, shell companies, and identity theft remain popular channels for siphoning funds.

    Key Tactics:

    Synthetic Identities: Mixing real and fabricated personal data to pass identity checks

    Exaggerated Financial Statements: Overstating business operations to qualify for large relief grants

    Impersonating Government Agencies: Fraudsters contacting businesses to “collect payback” on supposed overdue loans

    Prevention Tips:

    •Strengthen KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures and verify all supporting documents

    •Implement robust cross-matching systems to identify multiple loan applications under the same identity

    •Train staff to recognize and report any suspicious loan inquiries

    5. Health Care and Telemedicine Fraud

    What Happened:

    As telehealth expanded in 2024, so did health care fraud. Fake telemedicine providers offered bogus consultations, upcoded billing for non-existent treatments, or prescribed high-priced medications without medical necessity. Criminal rings also targeted older adults for personal data to bill insurers.

    Key Tactics:

    Phantom Billing: Charging insurance providers for services never rendered

    Telehealth Scams: Fraudulent “online clinics” luring patients with cheap or free exams, then billing insurers for premium services

    Patient Brokering: Paying third parties to recruit Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries into fraudulent schemes

    Prevention Tips:

    •Validate telemedicine providers’ credentials and watch for unusual spikes in patient volume

    •Regularly review claims data for outliers, such as exceedingly high billing for certain procedures

    •Encourage whistleblowers with clear, confidential reporting mechanisms

    Conclusion

    The fraud landscape in 2024 has been marked by sophisticated technology, evolving social engineering tactics, and continued exploitation of government programs. For anti-fraud professionals in the Pacific Northwest and beyond, staying vigilant means continuous education, robust internal controls, and a proactive approach to new threats.

    As we gear up for 2025, remember the importance of sharing intelligence, collaborating with industry peers, and leveraging resources available through the ACFE. Our collective effort is crucial in the ongoing fight against fraud.

    References

    1.Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2024). 2024 Report to the Nations: Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Retrieved from

    https://www.acfe.com/report-to-the-nations/2024

    2.FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3). (2024). 2024 Internet Crime Report. Retrieved from

    https://www.ic3.gov

    3.Federal Trade Commission (FTC). (2024). Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2024. Retrieved from

    https://www.ftc.gov

    (Note: Data for 2024 may be preliminary; the FTC typically releases final data annually.)

    4.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2024). Medicare Telemedicine Statistics and Fraud Alerts. Retrieved from

    https://www.cms.gov

    For more information about emerging fraud threats, relevant trainings, and certification resources, visit the PNW ACFE website. Stay informed, stay prepared, and together, let’s keep building a fraud-resistant Pacific Northwest.


  • December 21, 2024 3:00 PM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Fraud detection often involves uncovering irregularities in datasets that may hint at manipulation or deceit. One powerful tool for such analyses is Benford’s Law, a statistical principle that reveals predictable patterns in naturally occurring numerical datasets. By leveraging modern AI tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft Co-Pilot, Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) can efficiently apply Benford’s Law to detect potential financial fraud.

    What is Benford’s Law?

    Benford’s Law states that in datasets drawn from natural processes (e.g., financial transactions, population numbers), the leading digits of numbers are not uniformly distributed. Instead, smaller digits like 1 occur more frequently than larger digits. For example:

    1 is the leading digit about 30% of the time.

    9 appears as the leading digit less than 5% of the time.

    When a dataset deviates significantly from this expected distribution, it can indicate potential manipulation, such as fabricated or altered data. CFEs use Benford’s Law to identify anomalies in financial records, expense reports, and transaction logs, which may signify fraud.

    Using AI Tools to Simplify Benford’s Law Analysis

    Applying Benford’s Law manually can be time-consuming, especially with large datasets. This is where AI tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft Co-Pilot come into play, streamlining the process and enabling CFEs to focus on interpreting results and investigating irregularities.

    How ChatGPT Supports Benford’s Law Analysis

    ChatGPT can assist CFEs in several ways:

    1.Explaining Concepts: ChatGPT can provide clear explanations of Benford’s Law and guide users through its application.

    2.Code Generation: It generates scripts for programming languages like Python to automate Benford’s Law analysis.

    3.Result Interpretation: ChatGPT helps CFEs understand deviations and assess whether they warrant further investigation.

    Example Use Case with ChatGPT:

    Prompt: “Generate Python code to apply Benford’s Law to a financial dataset and visualize the results.”

    Output:

    import numpy as np

    import pandas as pd

    import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

    # Load dataset

    data = pd.read_csv("financial_data.csv")

    data['LeadingDigit'] = data['Amount'].astype(str).str[0].astype(int)

    # Benford's Law expected frequencies

    benford_freq = np.array([0.301, 0.176, 0.125, 0.097, 0.079, 0.067, 0.058, 0.051, 0.046])

    # Calculate actual frequencies

    actual_freq = data['LeadingDigit'].value_counts(normalize=True).sort_index().values

    # Plot comparison

    plt.bar(range(1, 10), benford_freq, alpha=0.7, label="Benford's Expected")

    plt.bar(range(1, 10), actual_freq, alpha=0.7, label="Actual Data")

    plt.xlabel('Leading Digit')

    plt.ylabel('Frequency')

    plt.legend()

    plt.show()

    This code quickly analyzes a dataset and visualizes deviations between expected and actual distributions.

    Microsoft Co-Pilot: Automating and Enhancing Analysis

    Microsoft Co-Pilot integrates with tools like Excel and Power BI to simplify Benford’s Law application, especially for professionals less comfortable with coding.

    1.Data Preparation: Co-Pilot can clean and organize datasets, such as extracting leading digits from transaction amounts.

    2.Automated Calculations: It generates formulas for calculating actual digit frequencies and comparing them to Benford’s expected distribution.

    3.Visualization: Co-Pilot helps create charts and dashboards to visualize discrepancies at a glance.

    Example Use Case with Co-Pilot:

    Request: “Set up a Benford’s Law analysis template in Excel, complete with a chart comparing actual and expected frequencies.”

    Result: Co-Pilot generates the necessary formulas and visualization, saving time and effort.

    Real-World Application of AI and Benford’s Law

    A CFE investigating procurement records used ChatGPT to generate a Python script for Benford’s Law analysis and Co-Pilot to visualize the data in Excel. The analysis revealed an unusually high occurrence of transactions with the leading digit 7, prompting further review. This led to the discovery of falsified invoices and kickback schemes.

    Key Benefits of AI Tools for CFEs

    1.Efficiency: Automates time-intensive tasks.

    2.Accessibility: Simplifies complex analyses for non-technical users.

    3.Enhanced Insight: Facilitates quick identification of anomalies.

    Conclusion

    Benford’s Law is a valuable tool in the CFE’s arsenal for uncovering financial fraud. By integrating modern AI tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft Co-Pilot, CFEs can conduct more efficient, accurate, and accessible analyses. As these tools continue to evolve, fraud examiners can expect even greater support in their investigations.

    If you’ve used AI tools in fraud detection, share your insights in the comments or join the discussion at our next ACFE PNW Chapter conference in April!

  • December 15, 2024 6:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Official misconduct in Washington State refers to instances where a public servant, with the intent to benefit personally or deprive someone of their rights, either:

    Commits an unauthorized act under the guise of official authority, or

    Fails to perform a duty required by law intentionally.

    This is defined under RCW 9A.80.010 and classified as a gross misdemeanor.

    Recent cases investigated by the Washington State Executive Ethics Board reveal the broad scope of misconduct and the penalties imposed. For example:

    A Department of Licensing employee used state resources for personal activities and faced a $2,500 civil penalty, with $1,000 suspended.

    A Corrections officer misused work hours for personal internet browsing, resulting in a $500 penalty, with $200 suspended.

    A Commerce Specialist at the Department of Agriculture harassed a colleague using state communication tools and was fined $1,500.

    These cases underscore the importance of identifying and addressing unethical behavior within public institutions. For investigators, recognizing misconduct is only the first step; understanding how to act appropriately and legally is critical.

    What Should Investigators Do If They Observe Official Misconduct?

    When investigators encounter potential cases of official misconduct, taking the right steps ensures an ethical, thorough, and effective resolution. Here’s what to do:

    1. Document Everything

    Maintain detailed records of the observed misconduct. Include dates, times, specific actions, and any relevant communications (emails, messages, or calls).

    Collect any physical or digital evidence related to the behavior in question, such as altered documents, unauthorized transactions, or misuse of state resources.

    Why? Thorough documentation provides a clear timeline and context, strengthening the case during internal or legal proceedings.

    2. Follow Internal Reporting Protocols

    Most organizations, including public institutions, have policies outlining how to report unethical behavior. Familiarize yourself with the chain of command and reporting structure.

    Submit the documentation and evidence to the appropriate authority, such as a supervisor, ethics officer, or compliance department.

    Why? Following protocols ensures the issue is handled by those authorized to investigate and act while protecting whistleblowers from potential retaliation.

    3. Report to the Washington State Executive Ethics Board (EEB)

    If the misconduct involves the misuse of public resources, failure to perform legal duties, or ethical violations, file a complaint with the Executive Ethics Board.

    Complaints can be submitted confidentially, and the EEB investigates violations of the state ethics law.

    Why? The EEB has the authority to impose penalties and mandate corrective actions, ensuring accountability for public servants.

    4. Engage Legal Counsel or an Ethics Advisor

    If you’re uncertain about the legality or implications of reporting misconduct, consult with an attorney or ethics advisor experienced in public sector investigations.

    Legal counsel can guide you on how to protect yourself while fulfilling your duty as an investigator.

    Why? Navigating misconduct cases can be complex, and expert advice helps avoid unintended legal or professional risks.

    5. Protect Yourself from Retaliation

    Familiarize yourself with whistleblower protection laws, such as the Washington State Whistleblower Protection Act (RCW 42.40), which safeguards state employees reporting improper governmental actions.

    If you face retaliation, document those instances and report them promptly.

    Why? Retaliation is illegal and can undermine an investigator’s ability to perform their duties. Knowing your rights is crucial for self-protection.

    6. Leverage External Resources

    Contact organizations like the ACFE or regional ethics associations for guidance and support in handling cases of official misconduct.

    Use fraud examination tools and AI platforms (such as Splunk or Datactics) to analyze data and identify patterns of wrongdoing.

    Why? External resources provide tools and expertise to supplement your investigation, especially in complex or large-scale cases.

    How Investigators Contribute to Integrity

    By identifying, reporting, and addressing official misconduct, investigators play a vital role in maintaining the ethical standards of public institutions. Beyond uncovering fraud, their efforts help restore trust, ensure compliance with laws, and reinforce the accountability of those in public service.

    Call to Action

    If you’ve encountered cases of misconduct or want to learn more about handling ethical violations in Washington State, join the ACFE Pacific Northwest Chapter community. Let’s work together to uphold the principles of integrity and accountability in public service.

    Have questions or insights? Share your thoughts below or join us at our next chapter conference!

    #FraudExamination #Ethics #PublicSector #OfficialMisconduct #ACFE #PNWACFE




  • December 08, 2024 5:00 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Fraud examination has evolved significantly with the integration of artificial intelligence (AI). Platforms powered by advanced machine learning (ML) and generative AI technologies are transforming the way fraud examiners detect, analyze, and prevent fraudulent activities. For fraud examiners in the Pacific Northwest and beyond, embracing these innovations can provide a significant edge in tackling sophisticated fraud schemes. Here’s a look at some of the top AI platforms and generative AI tools that are shaping the future of fraud detection and examination.

    Top AI Platforms for Fraud Detection

    1. Effectiv

    Effectiv is an AI-powered fraud detection platform designed for financial institutions. It automates Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business (KYB) processes while offering real-time transaction monitoring. Its sophisticated algorithms analyze vast datasets to detect anomalies and block fraudulent attempts in real-time.

    How it helps CFEs: Automates identity verification, streamlines investigations, and accelerates the detection of suspicious activities, reducing the manual burden on fraud examiners.

    2. Feedzai

    Feedzai specializes in real-time risk scoring and transaction monitoring. Using machine learning and big data analytics, it identifies patterns indicative of fraud and ensures secure financial operations for its clients.

    How it helps CFEs: Provides actionable insights into emerging fraud patterns, supports large-scale investigations, and enables proactive fraud prevention strategies.

    3. Forter

    Forter combines fraud prevention, payment optimization, and identity verification in a single platform. Its AI models analyze customer behavior to differentiate legitimate transactions from fraudulent ones.

    How it helps CFEs: Reduces false positives in fraud detection, ensures smooth digital commerce interactions, and enhances fraud examination efficiency.

    4. Pindrop Security

    Pindrop focuses on voice fraud detection by creating “acoustic fingerprints” of callers, analyzing call features, and identifying anomalies.

    How it helps CFEs: Assists in uncovering phone-based fraud schemes by providing detailed call data, enabling investigators to track and prevent fraudulent activities.

    5. Featurespace

    Featurespace employs Adaptive Behavioral Analytics to detect fraud early. Its AI models monitor customer behavior in real-time, identifying deviations that may indicate fraudulent activities.

    How it helps CFEs: Detects unknown fraud attacks, provides insights into emerging threats, and supports examiners in building proactive defense strategies.

    Generative AI Tools for Fraud Examination

    Generative AI, while often associated with content creation, is playing an increasingly vital role in fraud examination. Here’s how:

    1. Anomaly Detection

    Generative AI models like OpenAI’s GPT and Google’s Bard can assist in analyzing large datasets to identify anomalies. For example:

    Fraud Use Case: Examining transactional data for irregular patterns or unusual activity sequences that might indicate fraud.

    2. Document Verification

    AI-powered Optical Character Recognition (OCR) tools, such as Adobe Sensei or Abbyy FineReader, use generative AI to extract and verify information from documents.

    Fraud Use Case: Verifying authenticity of contracts, invoices, and other business documents, and identifying signs of forgery or tampering.

    3. AI-Powered Chatbots

    Platforms like ChatGPT can act as virtual assistants for fraud examiners, helping with:

    Drafting reports

    Creating summaries of case data

    Automating communication with stakeholders during investigations

    4. Social Media Monitoring

    AI tools like Brandwatch or Hootsuite Insights can track online mentions and activities related to fraud cases, offering real-time insights into fraud schemes proliferating on social platforms.

    Fraud Use Case: Monitoring for fake accounts, fraudulent advertisements, or discussions about illicit activities linked to fraud schemes.

    5. Predictive Analytics

    Generative AI models can forecast fraud trends by analyzing historical data. Tools like IBM Watson or Salesforce Einstein provide insights into:

    Future risks

    High-risk individuals or transactions

    Areas requiring enhanced oversight

    Embracing AI: A Call to Action for CFEs

    The tools and platforms highlighted here represent just the tip of the iceberg in AI’s potential to assist fraud examiners. By integrating these technologies into their workflow, Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) can uncover hidden fraud schemes, streamline their investigations, and build stronger defenses against evolving threats.

    For the ACFE PNW chapter, adopting these AI solutions not only enhances individual practices but also reinforces the collective mission to combat fraud effectively. Let’s leverage these innovations to stay ahead in the fight against fraud!

    Have you used AI tools in your investigations? Share your experiences with the ACFE PNW community on LinkedIn!



  • December 01, 2024 7:02 AM | Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Whistleblowers are essential in uncovering fraud, holding wrongdoers accountable, and protecting public resources. Washington State has been home to several significant whistleblower cases that highlight the value of a strong whistleblower framework and the pivotal role Certified Fraud Examiners (CFEs) play in fraud prevention. Below, we explore notable cases, key takeaways for CFEs, and how Washington’s whistleblower protections support fraud-fighting efforts.

    Washington’s Whistleblower Protections

    Washington State offers robust protections for whistleblowers under the State Employee Whistleblower Protection Act. These protections:

    •Safeguard state employees who report improper governmental actions.

    •Ensure confidentiality of whistleblower identities during investigations.

    •Prohibit retaliation, including dismissal, demotion, or punitive transfers, against employees who report wrongdoing.

    Private-sector employees also benefit from protections under various federal laws, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the False Claims Act.

    1. Washington State Auditor’s Office: Medicaid Fraud Case

    In 2020, a whistleblower exposed irregularities in Medicaid billing by healthcare providers, revealing fraudulent claims worth millions of dollars. Providers billed for non-existent services or exaggerated the time spent on patient care.

    Key Takeaways:

    Data Analysis: CFEs should employ advanced analytics to detect anomalies in billing and claims data.

    Foster a Speak-Up Culture: Organizations should create an environment where whistleblowers feel safe reporting concerns.

    Leverage State Resources: Learn more about Medicaid fraud prevention via the Washington State Auditor’s Office.

    2. Department of Labor and Industries: Contractor Fraud

    In 2018, a whistleblower revealed that a contractor misclassified workers to avoid paying workers’ compensation insurance. The fraud not only resulted in financial losses but also jeopardized employee protections.

    Key Takeaways:

    Monitor Compliance: CFEs should ensure contractors follow labor laws and insurance requirements.

    Fraud Awareness Training: Equip employees to recognize and report suspicious behavior.

    Document Review: Regularly examine contracts and payroll records for signs of fraud.

    For details on workers’ rights and compliance, visit the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries.

    3. City of Seattle: Embezzlement Scheme

    In 2016, a whistleblower exposed a city employee who manipulated financial records to embezzle public funds. The scheme, undetected for years, highlighted gaps in oversight and internal controls.

    Key Takeaways:

    Strengthen Internal Controls: Implement robust systems to limit unauthorized access to financial records.

    Conduct Routine Audits: Regular audits can help identify discrepancies early.

    Support Whistleblowers: Use resources like the Seattle Ethics and Elections Commission to establish whistleblower reporting channels.

    4. Washington Employment Security Department: COVID-19 Fraud

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, whistleblowers reported suspicious unemployment claims. Investigations revealed a massive fraud scheme where criminals exploited vulnerabilities in the unemployment benefits system, resulting in over $650 million in losses.

    Key Takeaways:

    Proactive Risk Assessment: Identify system vulnerabilities before fraud occurs.

    Fraud Detection Technology: Use automated tools to flag suspicious activities.

    Whistleblower Programs: A strong whistleblower program is essential for early detection.

    For information on unemployment fraud prevention, visit the Washington State Employment Security Department.

    How CFEs Can Support Whistleblowers

    Certified Fraud Examiners play a critical role in supporting whistleblowers and ensuring their efforts lead to meaningful action. Here’s how CFEs can contribute:

    Develop Policies: Help organizations create comprehensive whistleblower protection and reporting policies.

    Investigate Claims: Use investigative expertise to uncover and document fraud.

    Provide Training: Conduct training sessions to educate employees on fraud risks and reporting procedures.

    CFEs should also familiarize themselves with whistleblower protections and reporting processes. For more details, visit the ACFE Whistleblower Resources.

    Conclusion

    The significant whistleblower cases in Washington demonstrate the importance of protecting those who come forward to report fraud. By understanding whistleblower protections and fostering a culture of accountability, CFEs and organizations can strengthen fraud prevention efforts.

    For more information on whistleblower protections or to connect with experts, explore these resources:

    Washington State Auditor’s Office: Whistleblower Program

    National Whistleblower Center

    ACFE Whistleblower Center

    Let’s continue to support whistleblowers and work together to uphold the highest standards of integrity.

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   Next >  Last >> 


Copyright © 2024 Pacific Northwest Chapter, ACFE - All Rights Reserved.

"ACFE Pacific Northwest Chapter" is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Bellevue, WA

Contact Us Online   or email at info@pnwacfe.org

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software